Most Google Ads accounts are optimising blind.
Google receives a signal when someone clicks and a signal when someone converts. Everything in between — the session that lasted four minutes, the person who read your pricing page twice, the lead that was genuinely worth £8,000 vs the one that was never going to buy — Google sees none of it.
I fix that. And the results compound over time.
I'm a Google Ads specialist with 21 years of experience and $60M+ in ad spend managed. I work exclusively with service businesses at serious spend levels — typically $20,000/month and above — where signal quality, conversion intelligence, and proper offline tracking make the difference between an account that improves every month and one that plateaus.
What I do differently:
Most specialists focus on what happens before the click — keywords, match types, bidding, structure. I focus on that too. But the work that produces outsized results is what happens after the click.
I build three connected layers that most accounts don't have:
Behavioural signal tracking — meaningful engagement signals sent back to Google during every session, not just at conversion. Google learns what a genuinely interested visitor looks like for your specific business — even when they don't convert immediately.
Conversion value scoring — form submissions sent back to Google with predicted revenue values based on lead quality signals. Not a flat conversion count. A signal that reflects what each lead is actually worth. Google optimises toward high-value leads not just lead volume.
Offline conversion tracking — quoted values and won jobs connected back to the original click via CRM integration. Google learns which keywords, campaigns, and audiences produce real revenue — not just enquiries.
Together these give Google a complete picture of your customer journey from first session to closed job. The algorithm gets better data than any competitor's account is providing. Targeting improves continuously. Cost per quality lead drops over time.
Recent results:
• A UK business insurance provider: +144% revenue, +68% ROAS, +87% sales.
• A land surveying firm: -41% cost per quoted lead, +67% quoted lead ROAS, +12% value of work quoted.
• A resin driveway installer: -41% cost per acquisition, -40% ad spend for same results, +11% quote requests.
Melissa R. earns an estimated $7k/mo. That's 4.7× the typical freelancer and more than 99.73% of everyone we track.
In every case the improvement came from better signal quality and commercial thinking — not more budget.
What I work on:
• Google Ads audits and second opinions for accounts spending $20k+/month
• Full account management with conversion intelligence built in
• Conversion tracking architecture — GTM, GA4, Enhanced Conversions, offline imports
• CRM integration for quoted value and job value feed-back to Google
• Behavioural signal tracking and lead scoring setup
• Search, Performance Max, Microsoft/Bing Ads
• Landing page conversion analysis and recommendations
The questions I focus on:
• Is Google optimising toward your actual revenue — or just your conversion count?
• Are your best leads being treated the same as your worst leads by the algorithm?
• What signals is Google missing about the quality of your sessions and leads?
• Is your offline revenue connected back to the clicks that generated it?
• What needs fixing first to make the account measurably better within 90 days?
Who I work best with:
Service businesses — insurance, professional services, home improvement, trades, B2B — where lead quality variance is significant and the difference between a good lead and a bad one is worth thousands of pounds. Businesses where the owner or marketing director cares about revenue outcomes, not vanity metrics. Accounts where proper signal quality hasn't been set up and there's real performance left on the table.
If you want a senior specialist who will connect your ad spend to your actual business outcomes — not just manage your campaigns — send me a message or book a consultation.